How can a manager determine if a problem still exists after agreeing on a solution?

Enhance your skills for the PGM 3.0 Level 3 Facility Management Exam. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations to prepare effectively for your exam!

Establishing a timetable for follow-up is vital for determining if a problem still exists after a solution has been agreed upon. By setting a specific schedule for follow-up, the manager can ensure that there are opportunities to evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented solution over time. This systematic approach allows for observations about the problem's status and gathers insights from those affected by the solution.

Regular follow-ups can help assess whether the solution has been effective and if any new issues have arisen. It creates a structured method for monitoring progress and provides points in time to discuss ongoing results with the team. This proactive strategy reinforces accountability and encourages continuous improvement, ensuring that any residual or new problems can be identified and addressed promptly.

Other options may provide limited insight or effectiveness. Consulting team members only might not give a complete picture if there is a lack of open communication or if team members do not feel empowered to share concerns. Implementing a new training program may be beneficial, but without follow-up, it is unclear if the training has resolved the initial problem or if further action is needed. Revisiting the issue randomly lacks a structured approach, which could result in missed opportunities to gather meaningful data about the situation. Therefore, a systematic follow-up process is essential to assess the ongoing status of

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy