A member attempts to return a shirt and demands a cash refund. They complain to the HP who reprimands the AP. What is misaligned here?

Enhance your skills for the PGM 3.0 Level 3 Facility Management Exam. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations to prepare effectively for your exam!

In this scenario, the emphasis is on the expectations surrounding the return process and the role of various individuals involved. When a member demands a cash refund for the return of a shirt, they likely have a specific expectation regarding the store's return policy. If the store has a policy that does not allow cash refunds, but the member expects one regardless, there is a misalignment between the member's expectations and the actual store policy.

The reprimanding of the assistant person (AP) by the head person (HP) suggests there may also be an expectation regarding how employees handle customer complaints and return requests, which can create confusion if not clearly communicated. It's important for employees to understand the policy clearly and align with the expectations set forth by the company to manage customer service effectively.

In this situation, addressing expectations is crucial and signifies that both the customer and the employees need to be on the same page regarding what is acceptable within the framework of store policies. This highlights that expectations must be managed properly to avoid dissatisfaction for both customers and staff.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy